Compare careers

Factual side-by-side attributes from the imported O*NET and BLS OEWS datasets. No career is ranked or recommended.

Career A (or your current career)

Farmers, Ranchers, and Other Agricultural Managers

Career B (or your target career)

Forest and Conservation Technicians

Opens your browser print dialog — choose “Save as PDF”.

Comparison table

MetricFarmers, Ranchers, and Other Agricultural ManagersForest and Conservation Technicians
National median salary$89,900$54,560
Local median salaryNot publishedNot published
National employment6,50030,410
Typical educationNot recordedHigh School Diploma or the equivalent (such as a GED)
Job zone43
Important skillsActive Listening, Critical Thinking, Reading Comprehension, Speaking, Complex Problem SolvingActive Listening, Critical Thinking, Reading Comprehension, Speaking, Judgment and Decision Making
Related careersFarm Equipment Mechanics and Service Technicians, Biofuels Processing Technicians, Animal Breeders, Industrial Production ManagersHydrologic Technicians, Water Resource Specialists, Environmental Compliance Inspectors, Occupational Health and Safety Specialists

Career transition: skill overlap

Skill overlap

81%

13 of 16 target skills

Target-only skills

3

Current-only skills

6

Skill overlap compares O*NET skills rated at importance 3.0 or above for each occupation. It is a measure of listed skill overlap, not a probability of getting the job.

Shared skills

  • Critical Thinking
  • Active Listening
  • Reading Comprehension
  • Judgment and Decision Making
  • Speaking
  • Time Management
  • Monitoring
  • Coordination
  • Social Perceptiveness
  • Writing
  • Active Learning
  • Systems Analysis
  • Complex Problem Solving

Only in Forest and Conservation Technicians

  • Instructing
  • Service Orientation
  • Learning Strategies

Only in Farmers, Ranchers, and Other Agricultural Managers

  • Management of Personnel Resources
  • Persuasion
  • Negotiation
  • Operations Monitoring
  • Management of Financial Resources
  • Systems Evaluation